After reading three articles related to the power of phonemic awareness in young readers, I have been carefully weighing the advantages of specific strategies used to teach reading skills. The first thing that comes to my mind when I think of teaching students to read is the alphabet. I think that it is pretty safe to say that it is crucial to spend a lot of time on each individual letter while learning to read. A common strategy used in kindergarten classrooms is the 'Letter of the Week'. I know that I participated in this activity as a child and I consider it a fundamental reading strategy. Having a entire week designated to a letter gives the students time to learn the sound the letter makes, how to write the letter, and words that start with the particular letter. This seems like an effective strategy, right?
I would completely agree that using strategies, like the 'Letter of the Week', are the best way to teach fundamental reading skills and phonemic awareness. However, what happens when the students forget about the letter and everything that goes along with it? What do you do when several of your students are learning English for the first time and do not recognize the alphabet yet alone the words that start with the letter? I had never thought of these issues until reading the articles. I realized that many of the strategies used are geared towards children who are already familiar with the alphabet and who already have experience reading. For the students who are not familiar with English these strategies allow them to
memorize rather than
connect the letters with words and meaning.
I believe that as teachers we must use strategies that would be most beneficial to each and every student. For example, in the article by Bell and Jarvis one of the teachers strung letters of the alphabet across the classroom. She then put pictures of each student under the letter that their name started with. What I found my fascinating was that she also used universal objects, such as a McDonald's bag, and hung them under the letters. This allowed every student to connect the letter with something they are familiar with. While they may still struggle pointing out specific letters on demand, this strategy allows the students to
connect familiar words to the letter. Connecting words to letters is what is really most important to reading, not memorizing letters.
- Do you agree with forgetting about the 'Letter of the Week' type strategies?
- What type of strategies were used by your elementary school teachers?
- What are other activities that could be used to connect familiar words to letters, especially for students who are learning English as a second language?
I think that the 'Letter of the Week' strategy could be very beneficial for a lot of students. I think from there, it is up to the teacher to make sure that other students are involved and learning if they are not as familiar. I think the activities that week could vary, but the theme is a great jumping-off point for learning letters and reading. It should definitely go further than that, though!
ReplyDeleteI think that the Letter of the Week strategy should not be completely forgotten, but I do think that it needs to be revamped. Relating the letter of the week to your students' names and relating it to other concrete words that they already know will help them to associate the letter better when it comes to reading and sounding them out. You don't even have to focus on one letter a week, you can focus on three or four letters that week or even pick out letters that you know are commonly spelled in words together so they will having something to relate them to.
ReplyDeleteGreat points here, Courtney.
ReplyDelete